An Aetna prior authorization denial has to be read against the Gillen v. Aetna deposition record: Aetna's former chief medical officer testified he had never reviewed patient medical records before approving or denying claims. That admission, combined with CVS Caremark's vertical-integration conflict and Aetna's 2024 CMS corrective-action order, creates a specific written demand — confirmation that a qualified physician actually read the record — that Aetna is not well positioned to refuse.
This guide is the specific playbook for a Aetna prior authorization denial — the Gillen v. Aetna deposition record, the 2024 CMS corrective-action order, and the CVS Caremark vertical-integration conflict are the backdrop. What follows: the documented reasons Aetna issues this category of denial, what federal and state law actually require Aetna to do, the written appeal step by step, the evidence to gather, and the deadlines that control the whole process. Every statistic is sourced to KFF, CMS, HHS OIG, published court filings, or Aetna's own public disclosures.