An Aetna "not medically necessary" determination should be read against Gillen v. Aetna's record — the former chief medical officer's deposition testimony that he approved or denied claims without reading the medical record. Your written appeal should demand the reviewer's name, specialty, board certification, and time spent with the actual chart. Aetna's 2024 CMS corrective-action order and the CVS Caremark vertical-integration conflict supply the regulatory backdrop that makes refusal costly on the record.
This guide is the specific playbook for a Aetna medical necessity denial — the Gillen v. Aetna deposition record, the 2024 CMS corrective-action order, and the CVS Caremark vertical-integration conflict are the backdrop. What follows: the documented reasons Aetna issues this category of denial, what federal and state law actually require Aetna to do, the written appeal step by step, the evidence to gather, and the deadlines that control the whole process. Every statistic is sourced to KFF, CMS, HHS OIG, published court filings, or Aetna's own public disclosures.