UnitedHealthcare Appeal Letter Template
This template addresses UHC's specific denial tactics and includes all elements required by law. Customize it for your situation, attach supporting documents, and send via certified mail.
Basic Template (All Denial Types)
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]
[Phone Number]
[Email Address]
[Date]
UnitedHealthcare Appeals Department
[Address from denial letter or:]
P.O. Box 30555
Salt Lake City, UT 84130
RE: APPEAL OF CLAIM DENIAL
Member Name: [Your name or patient name]
Member ID: [Your UHC ID number]
Claim Number: [From denial letter]
Date of Service: [Date of denied service]
Provider: [Doctor/facility name]
Date of Denial: [Denial letter date]
Dear UnitedHealthcare Appeals Department:
I appeal the denial of [specific service/treatment] dated [denial date].
[For ERISA plans, add:]
This appeal is submitted pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Section 503 and implementing regulations at 29 CFR §2560.503-1. I request a full and fair review of this denial.
[For Medicare Advantage, add:]
This appeal is submitted pursuant to 42 CFR §422.562 and §422.568. [For expedited: "I request expedited review because delay would seriously jeopardize my health or ability to regain maximum function."]
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
[Describe your medical condition and why the denied treatment is necessary. Example:]
I am a [age]-year-old [gender] diagnosed with [condition] on [date]. My condition causes [symptoms/functional limitations]. Despite trying [list conservative treatments], my condition has [worsened/not improved].
My physician, Dr. [Name], [specialty], has recommended [denied treatment/service] because [medical reason]. This treatment is medically necessary to [prevent deterioration/improve function/treat condition].
II. WHY THE DENIAL IS WRONG
A. The Denied Service is Covered Under My Plan
My Summary Plan Description states [quote relevant coverage language]. [Denied service] falls within this coverage because [explanation].
B. The Service is Medically Necessary
UnitedHealthcare's own medical policy [policy name/number] defines medical necessity as [quote definition]. My case meets this definition because:
- [How you meet first criterion]
- [How you meet second criterion]
- [Continue for each criterion]
Dr. [Name]'s attached letter explains in detail why [service] is medically necessary for my specific condition. Key points include:
- [Point from doctor's letter]
- [Point from doctor's letter]
- [Point from doctor's letter]
C. Clinical Evidence Supports This Treatment
[Choose relevant evidence:]
- The treatment is recommended by [NCCN/medical society] guidelines (attached)
- Peer-reviewed studies demonstrate efficacy (attached)
- The treatment is FDA-approved for my condition
- This is standard of care for my diagnosis
III. UHC'S DENIAL REASONING IS FLAWED
[Address the specific denial reason. Choose appropriate section below:]
[If denied as "not medically necessary":]
UHC claims the service is "not medically necessary," but this conclusion is contradicted by:
- My treating physician's clinical judgment
- Documented failure of alternative treatments
- Clinical guidelines supporting this treatment
- My individual circumstances requiring this specific intervention
UHC's reviewer, who has never examined me, cannot override my treating specialist's medical judgment without specific clinical evidence—which UHC has not provided.
[If denied as "experimental/investigational":]
UHC incorrectly labels this treatment as "experimental." However:
- FDA approved [drug/device] for [indication] on [date]
- [NCCN/medical society] guidelines recommend this treatment (Category [X])
- Peer-reviewed studies demonstrate efficacy (attached)
- This is widely accepted medical practice, not experimental
[If NaviHealth/AI denial for rehab/SNF:]
UHC's denial appears to be based on the NaviHealth algorithm rather than individualized medical assessment. This automated system:
- Has been the subject of multiple lawsuits alleging systematic over-denials
- Is currently under investigation by CMS
- Cannot account for my individual circumstances
- Should not override my physician's clinical judgment
I request that a physician—not an algorithm—review my case considering:
- My home environment: [stairs/no caregiver/safety concerns]
- My functional limitations: [specific ADL dependencies]
- My ongoing therapy needs: [specific skilled services required]
- My individual complications: [comorbidities/setbacks]
[If emergency care denied as out-of-network:]
Federal law and my plan require coverage of emergency care regardless of network status. UHC's denial violates:
- The Prudent Layperson Standard: My symptoms ([chest pain/severe bleeding/etc.]) warranted immediate emergency care
- The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)
- My plan's emergency coverage provisions
The determination of "emergency" must be based on my symptoms at the time I sought care, not the final diagnosis after tests.
IV. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
I am submitting the following documents in support of this appeal:
- Letter from Dr. [Name] dated [date] explaining medical necessity
- Medical records documenting my condition and treatment history
- [Clinical guidelines/NCCN recommendations]
- [Peer-reviewed studies supporting treatment]
- [Failed alternative treatment documentation]
- [Any other relevant evidence]
[For ERISA plans, add:]
Pursuant to 29 CFR §2560.503-1, I request access to:
- All documents, records, and other information relevant to my claim
- The specific medical policy or guideline UHC relied upon
- Any internal rules, guidelines, or protocols used to make this determination
- Identification of medical or vocational experts whose advice was obtained
V. CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, UnitedHealthcare's denial of [service/treatment] is incorrect. The service is:
- Covered under my plan
- Medically necessary as determined by my treating physician
- Supported by clinical evidence
- Appropriate for my condition
I respectfully request that UnitedHealthcare reverse its denial and approve coverage for [service/treatment].
[For ERISA plans, add timeline:]
I expect a written response within [30 days for standard/72 hours for urgent] as required by ERISA regulations.
[For Medicare Advantage, add:]
I expect a decision within [30 days for standard/72 hours for expedited] as required by Medicare regulations. If UHC upholds the denial, I request immediate forwarding to the Independent Review Entity for external review.
Please send all correspondence regarding this appeal to the address above.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your signature]
[Your printed name]
Enclosures: [List each attachment]
cc: [Your doctor's name, if appropriate]
[Your attorney, if applicable]
Specific Examples
Example 1: Medical Necessity Denial
Scenario: UHC denied prior authorization for MRI, claiming "not medically necessary."
Key Language to Add:
"My neurologist, Dr. Smith, ordered MRI imaging due to progressive neurological symptoms including [specific symptoms]. Conservative treatment with [medications/PT] has failed to resolve symptoms over [time period].
UHC's medical policy XYZ states MRI is appropriate when 'clinical symptoms suggest [diagnosis] and conservative treatment has failed.' My case meets both criteria:
- Clinical symptoms: [List specific symptoms from doctor's notes]
- Failed conservative treatment: [List treatments tried with dates and outcomes]
The attached letter from Dr. Smith explains why MRI is necessary to [rule out serious pathology/guide treatment/etc.]. UHC cannot override this clinical judgment without providing specific medical evidence to the contrary—which the denial letter does not contain."
Example 2: Experimental/Investigational Denial
Scenario: UHC denied cancer immunotherapy as "experimental."
Key Language to Add:
"UHC incorrectly characterizes pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as 'experimental' for my triple-negative breast cancer. This is factually wrong:
- FDA Approval: Pembrolizumab was FDA-approved for triple-negative breast cancer on November 13, 2020 (FDA approval letter attached).
- Clinical Guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) lists this treatment as Category 1—the highest level of evidence (NCCN guidelines page attached).
- Peer-Reviewed Evidence: The KEYNOTE-522 trial published in New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated significant pathologic complete response rates (study attached).
- Standard of Care: This treatment is widely used and covered by other major insurers.
UHC's own medical policy states experimental treatments are those 'not FDA-approved or widely accepted in medical practice.' Pembrolizumab meets neither criterion for my diagnosis. The denial contradicts UHC's own policy."
Example 3: NaviHealth SNF Denial (Medicare Advantage)
Scenario: NaviHealth AI denied continued skilled nursing after hip replacement.
Key Language to Add:
"UHC's NaviHealth system denied continued skilled nursing on Day 7, claiming I could complete rehabilitation at home. This algorithmic determination ignores my individual circumstances:
My Home Environment:
- Two-story home with stairs to bedroom and bathroom
- No first-floor bedroom or bathroom
- Live alone—no caregiver available for assistance
- No family within 100 miles
My Functional Status:
- Require maximum assistance with transfers per PT notes (attached)
- Cannot safely navigate stairs per OT assessment (attached)
- Fall risk score of [X] indicating unsafe discharge
- Need continued skilled PT/OT to achieve safe independence
NaviHealth Algorithm Problems:
The NaviHealth system is currently:
- Subject of multiple class-action lawsuits (Wegner v. UHC, Eichhorn v. UHC) alleging systematic over-denials
- Under investigation by CMS for Medicare Advantage denial practices
- Documented to reverse 90% of denials when members appeal (per lawsuit allegations)
I request that a physician—not an algorithm—review my case considering my individual circumstances. My surgeon, Dr. [Name], and SNF physician both document continued medical necessity for skilled nursing (letters attached).
Medicare coverage criteria for SNF (42 CFR §409.31) require:
- Prior 3-day hospital stay âś“ (attached discharge summary)
- Need for skilled nursing/therapy âś“ (PT/OT notes attached)
- Services reasonable and necessary âś“ (physician documentation attached)
I meet all criteria. An algorithm that has never examined me cannot override clinical judgment."
Tips for Writing Your Appeal
- Be Specific
- Reference exact dates, providers, services
- Quote from denial letter and plan documents
- Cite specific medical policy criteria
- Stay Professional
- Avoid angry or emotional language
- Stick to facts and medical evidence
- Let your evidence speak for you
- Use UHC's Own Standards
- Request their specific medical policy
- Show how you meet their stated criteria
- Point out when they violate their own policies
- Include Strong Physician Support
- Detailed doctor's letter is crucial
- Address specific denial reasons
- Provide clinical justification
- Reference guidelines and evidence
- Organize Your Evidence
- Number and label all attachments
- Reference attachments in letter
- Make it easy for reviewer to find evidence
- Send Properly
- Certified mail with return receipt
- Keep copy of everything
- Save tracking information
- Follow up if no response by deadline
What to Attach
Always Include:
- Copy of denial letter
- Physician letter of medical necessity
- Relevant medical records
Include When Applicable:
- Clinical guidelines (NCCN, medical societies)
- Peer-reviewed studies
- FDA approval documents
- Documentation of failed alternative treatments
- Functional assessments
- Second opinion letters
- Photos/videos (for DME denials)
- Pain diary or symptom log
After You Send Your Appeal
- Track the Timeline
- ERISA: 30 days standard, 72 hours urgent
- Medicare: 30 days standard, 72 hours expedited
- ACA: Varies by state
- Follow Up If Needed
- Call UHC if deadline approaching with no decision
- Document all phone calls (date, time, representative name)
- Send follow-up letter if deadline passed
- If Denied Again
- Request external review immediately
- File complaint with state DOI
- For ERISA: consider DOL complaint
- For Medicare: automatic IRE review